PBKS vs DC | younger spinner Harpreet Brar rattles stumps of in-form Prithvi Shaw

Spread the love

PBKS vs DC | Young spinner Harpreet Brar rattles stumps of in-form Prithvi Shaw

harpeet brar, dc vs pbks, pbks vs dc
Image Origin : IPLT20.COM

PBKS’ Harpreet Brar celebrates after bowling out DC’s Prithvi Shaw (far left) in Ahmedabad on Sunday (May 2, 2021).

Young left-arm off-spinner Harpreet Brar’s clout has immediately started growing within the IPL 2021 as after his heroics against star-studded batting line-up of Royal Challengers Bangalore, he scalped another big award in in-form Prithvi Shaw.

The 25 year old Punjab spiner, which took 3/19 against RCB that included wickets of Virat Kohli, Glenn Maxwell and AB de Villiers, dismissed Delhi Capitals’ in-form off-spinner by rattling their stumps at an important juncture associated with the game.

Relevant Stories

Video website link of Prithvi Shaw wicket:

Shaw, which scored a mesmerising 41-ball 82 last Thursday against Kolkata Knight Riders, features enjoyed an excellent form in domestic season therefore took special work from Brar to get rid of him on Sunday when Shaw was working away with the match for DC with a 22-ball 39 inside powerplay.

READ more...  Mumbai Indians vs Sunrisers Hyderabad Dream11 Prediction: IPL 2021 Fantasy Recommendations

However, Brar made the most out of Shaw’s practice of going past an acceptable limit towards the leg-side to gain access to the off stump; lacking the basketball while driving as this one turned and escaped the advantage hitting wood. 

Earlier in the day inside match, Shaw and Dhawan offered perfect start to DC in the run chase. Shaw, who had been the aggresor in the 63-run orifice stand of 37 deliveries, shot three boundaries as numerous sixes while Dhawan slammed four fours as DC had been right on the track to chase 167 set by PBKS.

Stand-in skipper Mayank Agarwal, whom took over captaincy obligations instead of injured and out KL Rahul, scored a 58-ball 99 on the evening but not enough help from the other end meant they couldn’t impose a big total from the board.

Published at Sun, 02 May 2021 17:02:39 +0000

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular