UK High Court declines Nirav Modi'' s extradition plea


London: Nirav Modi has lost the first phase of his extradition appeal in the High Court here, simply over two months after the wanted diamond merchant’s extradition to India was bought by UK House Secretary Priti Patel in the approximated USD 2-billion Punjab National Bank (PNB) scam case.

The case was prior to a High Court judge for a choice “on the documents” sent for the interest determine if there are any premises for an appeal against the House Secretary’s decision on April 16 or the Westminster Magistrates Court February ruling in favour of Modi’s extradition to India to face charges of fraud and cash laundering.

A High Court official verified that the permission to appeal was “turned down on paper” on Tuesday, which leaves the 50-year-old jeweller with a chance for his attorneys to make his case at a short oral hearing in the High Court with a restored “delegate appeal” application for a judge to determine if it can proceed to a complete appeal hearing.

Under the legal guidelines, Modi, as an appellant, has 5 service days to apply for such an oral consideration, providing him time till next week. If a renewal application is made, it will be noted prior to a High Court judge for a hearing. It is comprehended that Modi prepares to make such an application.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), which appears in court on behalf of the Indian authorities, said it is waiting for the next phase in the process.

“If they are enabled to appeal then we would object to any appeal proceedings on behalf of the GOI [federal government of India],” the CPS had said last month.

Meanwhile, Modi stays behind bars at Wandsworth Prison in south-west London since his arrest over 2 years ago on March 19, 2019.

In his ruling in February, District Judge Sam Goozee concluded that the diamond merchant has a case to answer before the Indian courts and that the bars to extradition under UK law do not use in his case.

As part of a very thorough judgment, the judge concluded that he was satisfied that there is proof upon which Modi might be founded guilty in relation to the conspiracy to defraud the PNB.

“A prima facie case is developed, ” he said, in relation to all counts of charges brought by the Central Bureau of Examination (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED)– consisting of cash laundering, intimidation of witnesses and disappearance of proof.

The court had actually likewise accepted that while Modi’s mental health had actually weakened due to the lengthy imprisonment in a London prison, exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, his threat of suicide did not fulfill the high threshold to conclude that it would be “unjust or oppressive” to extradite him.

Modi is the subject of 2 sets of criminal procedures, with the CBI case associating with a large-scale fraud upon PNB through the deceitful getting of letters of undertaking (LoUs) or loan arrangements, and the ED case relating to the laundering of the earnings of that fraud.

He likewise deals with 2 service charges of “causing the disappearance of proof” and intimidating witnesses or “criminal intimidation to cause death “, which were added on to the CBI case.

“I do decline the submissions that NDM [Nirav Deepak Modi] was involved in genuine service and utilizing the LoUs in an allowable fashion, ” notes the magistrates’ court judgment forwarded to the House Secretary.

India is a designated Part 2 country by virtue of the Extradition Act 2003, which implies it is the Cabinet minister who has the authority to order a requested individual’s extradition after considering all problems. The House Secretary’s order rarely breaks the court’s conclusions, as she has to consider just really narrow bars to extradition, which do not apply in Modi’s case.

The case will now go through the next phase of the High Court appeals procedure, with a restored application anticipated to cause a hearing in which Modi’s lawyers will argue in favour of a complete appeal hearing against the extradition order.

As witnessed in the extradition case of former Kingfisher Airlines chief Vijay Mallya – who remains on bail in the UK while a “confidential ” matter, believed to relate to an asylum demand, is solved– there is still some way to precede Modi can be moved from Wandsworth Prison in London to Barrack 12 Arthur Road Jail in Mumbai and face trial in India.

Published at Wed, 23 Jun 2021 19:45:04 +0000